The creation of NATO is another example. Although the North American Treaty Organization plays an important role in the areas of collective security and humanitarian efforts, the main justification for its continued global importance is its central role in international politics. Its main objective is to create a community of nations with shared values, nations that value liberal and democratic government and the protection and enforcement of human rights. While their main concern was communism, NATO`s main member states came together near a common goal. Once international customers have made a purchase, how are they served when they are so far away? Here, too, linguistic and cultural differences must be taken into account in order to overcome one of the greatest drawbacks of international trade. With transnational borders, it becomes very difficult for a company to sue. Copyright in the United States can contribute to the protection of a company as long as the country where the product is sold has signed one of the international treaties for the protection of intellectual property. Some countries also have their own separate copyright and trademark rights, which can be submitted to protect companies that sell products in their country. What makes this one of the main drawbacks of international trade is that cultural differences are often never documented. It is the unwritten rules of trade in the country that are difficult to detect and can be even more difficult to resolve. Another weakness of international law is its inability to impose itself. This is its subjective intrinsic nature of culture.
This legacy stems from the Peace of Westphalia of 1648, a treaty that launched the concept of sovereign states, each legally allowed to govern its own territory and population without outside influences. Of course, this has worked well in a world that is not so interdependent. Now, however, this is no longer the case. Culture is so closely linked to politics and politics that it is difficult to reach a general consensus on a particular issue and to deal with it even more. More often than not, culture does not become a scapegoat for non-compliance with international legal norms, a buffer between international policies when they relate to domestic politics, and loopholes in the reinterpretation of laws. In addition, culture becomes an excuse for governments that do not meet certain standards. These governments will pass laws and work to promote and enforce the law, but ultimately blame stagnant outcomes on people in their traditional views or culture. The Achilles heel of international law should be religion, as it enforces the strictest and most indisputable laws and creates the most difficult situations for the law. For example, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) is one of the most important organizations in the United Nations. The organization constantly addresses issues that affect international women and their cultures.
Every culture sees women differently in terms of social and political norms. .